Independent practice / Open for engagements

I help sellers sell — with proposals and AI that actually works.

Twenty years in proposal work — eight in commercial and federal procurement including DoD, twelve inside Oracle's global proposal organization. Independent now — bringing strategy, enablement, content, and AI judgment to teams that want to win more without losing the craft.

Four ways I help teams win.

Built on twenty years of operating inside high-volume proposal organizations — across federal procurement and global enterprise — and shaped by the moments when strategy, content, enablement, and AI either click together or fall apart.

Service 01

Design the system that wins.

Solution design & implementation
  • Map the current proposal motion end-to-end: where time leaks, where quality slips, where deals stall
  • Design the workflow, roles, and platform setup that fit the team — not a textbook
  • Stand up the changes with the people who'll live in them, not over their heads
Service 02

Get the team using the system — at scale.

Enablement curation & execution
  • Build enablement programs sellers and contributors actually consume — video, async, live
  • Operate as a one-person production shop or partner with your team's L&D function
  • Measure adoption honestly: who's using it, who isn't, and what to do about it
Service 03

Make the content actually answer the question.

Content strategy & alignment
  • Audit and rebuild the proposal content library so answers are accurate, current, and findable
  • Establish SME workflows that keep technical answers from going stale
  • Get AI-ready: structure content so retrieval systems return the right answer, not a confident wrong one
Service 04

Raise the bar around the people doing the work.

Mentoring & support
  • Mentor proposal managers, content managers, and enablement producers on craft and judgment
  • Coach senior contributors through complex, high-stakes responses where strategy and story have to land together
  • Build standing partnerships — show up steady when the team needs a sharp outside eye

Twenty years. One coherent arc.

Two decades of operating proposal motion — across state, local, federal civilian, and Department of Defense procurement, then inside Oracle's global enterprise proposal organization. Through reorgs, layoff cycles, and the messy reality of high-stakes response work in any environment.

On proposal quality / Federal record
"Exceptional"
— Air Force selection committee
The highest rating on the federal past-performance scale.
From DoD procurement to AI strategy — same craft, sharpening over time.
Eight years in commercial and government proposals — state, local, federal civilian, and Department of Defense work. Then twelve years inside Oracle: Senior Proposal Manager, Video Enablement Producer, Content Manager for SaaS Cloud Security, Senior Content Strategist for AI in Proposal Automation. One continuous arc of helping sellers win.
  • 300+
    Proposals managed across commercial, highly regulated, and SLED — with strategy and story landing together.
  • 350+
    Instructional videos. A one-person production shop scaling proposal & platform fluency to global sales teams.
  • 1K+
    Content items curated for the SCS portfolio — built and maintained as the source of truth for global RFx response.
  • RAG · SLM · LLM
    Hands-on evaluation, vendor product-development partnership, and structured usability testing for AI in proposals.

How I think about AI in the work.

The hard part isn't installing AI. It's deciding where it earns its place — and where the human still has to lead. Three takes I bring to every engagement.

Take 01

Humans lead on review and vision.

AI accelerates the work; people own the outcome. The art of a winning proposal is judgment under pressure — strategy, story, trust. That's not what AI is good at, and pretending otherwise burns deals and credibility.

Take 02

Augmentation over abdication.

The teams winning with AI aren't going hands-off. They're the ones putting AI to work as a force multiplier inside well-designed workflows — with humans owning judgment, voice, and the call on what's good enough to ship.

Take 03

Tools have to earn their place.

I've seen what happens when leadership picks an AI tool because of hype instead of fit — wrong answers in client-facing content, lost trust, real money on the floor. Tools serve the work. The work doesn't bend to the tool.

Three engagement shapes.

Most engagements start with a conversation. From there, they tend to fit one of three shapes — but the right scope is always built around the actual problem, not a fixed menu.

Shape 01 / Assessment

A fast, honest read.

≈ 2–4 weeks

A focused diagnostic on your proposal motion, content library, or AI readiness. Findings, recommendations, and a clear next-step decision document. Good for teams that want a sharp outside eye before committing to a build.

Shape 02 / Build

Ship the change.

≈ 1–3 months

A scoped engagement to design and stand up a specific improvement — workflow redesign, content rebuild, enablement program, or AI integration. We deliver the work and transition it to the team that owns it.

Shape 03 / Standing partner

A steady outside voice.

Ongoing retainer

Fractional support for proposal leaders who want a thinking partner on call — for complex deals, mentoring conversations, AI strategy decisions, and the moments when an honest outside read is worth more than another internal meeting.

Let's have a 30-minute conversation.

No deck. No pitch. Tell me what you're working on, what's not landing, and what'd be different if it did. If there's a fit, we'll figure out a shape that makes sense.

Reach out on LinkedIn →